Principal Methodology -
Heuristic for Substantive Studies in History of Science, Technology
& Medicine (1)
Instant elaboration is due to observed need of analytical clarity and
meaningful rigorous accessibility of textual analysis in this academic
area. Modern historians of science routinely and fashionably enough either
adopt unstructured literary styles of interdisciplinary analyses, often
resulting in a randomly mixed bag of sociological, statistical, geo-political,
uniquely feminist, economic and metaphysical observations of phenomenological
correlations and interdependencies, or, (and somewhat less successfully)
resort to shooting down skillfully conjured up paper tigers in endless
pursuit of displaying keenness of insight and observation in obviating
dangers of simple cause and effect analysis associated with any STM development.
(2)
These often chaotic free-associative literary approaches, while conducive
to individual showcases of erudition and certain degree of flair in now
and again elucidating the Big picture, far more often than not render the
written STM scholarship unbearably tedious and, in effect, inaccessible
to a non-specialist reader. More importantly, such 'freestyle' scholarship
is largely incongruent with the process of educating scientists, medics
and technologists, by failing to impart with any structural integrity a
comprehensive historical narrative of the birth (or evolution), analytical
foundations and significance of a given scientific, technological or medical
development.
In as much as a settled methodical structurally lucid style of STM historical
analysis is key to facilitating effective accessibility of relevant scholarship,
keenness of comprehension and invention aptitude for any scientist, medic
or technologist, following standard methodology heuristic is proposed.
(3)
I Description
1. Chronology
2. Content
3. Foundation
4. Methodology
II Relation
III Analysis
1. Errors and Omissions
2. Alternatives
IV Commentary
Description of a STM development subject of historical analysis should
begin with a short statement of chronology - placing distinct scrutinized
product of knowledge in light of civilization's timeline, with known temporal
orientation in light of preceding and subsequent developments. When appropriate,
a brief I-owe-you note of apparent temporal or conceptual imprecision is
sufficient; due to the process nature of many a STM development, distinct
identification and orientation in time of all significant elements may
require elaboration in the Relation, Analysis and Commentary sections.
Content section follows with an adequately detailed statement of subject
matter development. A non-technical summary may precede, the more rigorous
description to follow.
Foundation section, in turn, shall serve to illuminate all identifiable
significant then existing or assumed developments, admixture to which of
identifiable logical processes, events of natural, accidental, or experimental
nature, human insight or intuition immediately preceded coming about of
subject development. It is, essentially, a descriptive building blocks
catalog, offering clarification of the givens and leading to culmination
of insights into the nuts and bolts of 'how' of both chance technical and
conceptual innovations and man's purposeful ingenuity, addressed in the
Methodology.
Methodology section, finally, (and where purposeful observation, reasoning,
action upon or manipulation of building elements is surmised) spells out
key identifiable logical processes, procedures and additional elements
of natural, accidental or experimental nature, human insight or intuition
immediately preceding coming about of subject development. It is the section
of enlightening 'Tao of How' in coming about of a new product of knowledge.
It is not likely to be trivially deterministic, but rather clarifying and
insightful.
Relation chapter shall further outline gleaned coherent relationship
of subject development to those perceived as connectedly preceding and
following. It may impart further understanding of comparative, evolutionary
and facilitative interdependence of meaningfully related products of knowledge.
(4)
Analysis chapter partitions domain for the critical analytical discourse
on both -- any potential errors and omissions, and alternative considerations
(5) -- globally scrutinizing building blocks,
procedural and analytical foundations of any given product of knowledge.
Commentary chapter will conclude historical analysis of an STM development
by augmenting the outlined form of substantive analysis with poignant less
immediate and interdisciplinary considerations brought to bear for a fuller
realization and desired accentuation of varied aspects of subject's significance.
Instant format is proposed not by form of a straight jacket, but as
a vital modicum of literary and cognitive discipline in the vastly expanding
field in dire need of means of efficient and comprehensive accessibility
for generations of scientists, technologists and medics to come.
It allows for an intellectually disciplined manner of presentation and
realization of often already technical and complex material - a valued
asset to both scholar and student alike.
Dr. Igor Leonidovich Mestman
Nikita University RIIC-STM*
August 9, 2001
Footnotes referenced in parenthesis, supra:
1. Science, technology and medicine selectively abbreviated
to STM.
2. Be it a new significant conceptualization or realization,
theory of set phenomena interrelations framed in existing conceptualizations,
process of making, or artifact of mechanical invention. 'Development' here
is utilized broadly to stand for any clearly identified product of knowledge
-theoretical, procedural, physical.
3. Pressing need of this form of S.T.M. historical analysis
is obviated by geometric rate of growth of accumulated products of knowledge,
otherwise surely deemed to become mere facts in a progressively impenetrable
annals of historic jungle of documented progress.
4. So, for instance, described relationship between preceding
developments of naval astro-navigation and known consistent properties
of ferromagnetic orientation of a needle on water surface may further coherent
understanding of original naval compass, and subsequent developments compensating
for later discovered ocean floor magnetospheric shift anomalies.
5. I.e.- considerations of potential alternative elements,
methods, logic, allocations of content significance, insights, intuitions
or realms of exploration.
* Nikita University Research Institute of International Cooperation
in Science, Technology & Medicine Research Foundation -- http://augustian.tripod.com/RESEARCH.htm
@ Sapere-Aude Copyright 2001
Editor's note: Please e-mail for full text of the article
No part of this essay may be reproduced without crediting author
and publication |